Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. REYNA, 8:12CR73. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20120621b05 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2012
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge. At the conclusion of the hearing on June 20, 2012, on defendant's Motion to Suppress (#29), I stated my conclusions on the record and my decision to recommend that the motion to suppress be granted in part and denied in part In accordance with that announcement, IT IS RECOMMENDED to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge, that the Motion to Suppress (#29) be granted in part and denied in part,
More

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER

F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge.

At the conclusion of the hearing on June 20, 2012, on defendant's Motion to Suppress (#29), I stated my conclusions on the record and my decision to recommend that the motion to suppress be granted in part and denied in part In accordance with that announcement,

IT IS RECOMMENDED to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge, that the Motion to Suppress (#29) be granted in part and denied in part, as set out in the record.

FURTHER, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The clerk shall cause a transcript of the hearing to be prepared and filed.

2. Pursuant to NECrimR 59.2, any objection to the magistrate's Findings and Recommendation shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days after the unredacted transcript is available to counsel. Failure to timely object may constitute a waiver of any such objection. The brief in support of any objection shall be filed at the time of filing such objection. Failure to file a brief in support of any objection may be deemed an abandonment of the objection.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer