FURR v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, 8:11CV251. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20120711b30
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to extend (Filing No. 27 ). The Court finds the motion should be granted and that defendant should have the same extension to file a reply brief, if it wishes to do so. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) The motion is granted; plaintiff shall until July 17, 2012, to submit declarations in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. 2) Defendant shall have until July 24, 2012, to file a reply br
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to extend (Filing No. 27 ). The Court finds the motion should be granted and that defendant should have the same extension to file a reply brief, if it wishes to do so. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) The motion is granted; plaintiff shall until July 17, 2012, to submit declarations in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. 2) Defendant shall have until July 24, 2012, to file a reply bri..
More
ORDER
LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to extend (Filing No. 27). The Court finds the motion should be granted and that defendant should have the same extension to file a reply brief, if it wishes to do so. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) The motion is granted; plaintiff shall until July 17, 2012, to submit declarations in opposition to the motion for summary judgment.
2) Defendant shall have until July 24, 2012, to file a reply brief, if it wishes to do so.
Source: Leagle
