Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. RUSSELL, 4:12CR3042. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20120718954 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge. Counsel for the parties state the volume of documentary discovery in this case is substantial, and the defendant needs additional time to review the discovery before determining if pretrial motions should be filed. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) As to both defendants, pretrial motions and briefs shall be filed on or before November 21, 2012. 2) The ends of justice served by allowing additional time for the defendants to review disco
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.

Counsel for the parties state the volume of documentary discovery in this case is substantial, and the defendant needs additional time to review the discovery before determining if pretrial motions should be filed.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) As to both defendants, pretrial motions and briefs shall be filed on or before November 21, 2012. 2) The ends of justice served by allowing additional time for the defendants to review discovery outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Accordingly, as to both defendants, the time between today's date and November 21, 2012, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because this case remains "unusual and complex," and continues to be exempted from the time restrictions of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii)i.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer