Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ, 8:12CR330. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20140411a05 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge. Defendant has moved to continue defendant's change of plea hearing (filing no. 44). As explained in the motion, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue (filing no. 44) is granted. 2) The defendant's plea hearing will be held before the under
More

ORDER

JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge.

Defendant has moved to continue defendant's change of plea hearing (filing no. 44). As explained in the motion, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant's motion to continue (filing no. 44) is granted.

2) The defendant's plea hearing will be held before the undersigned judge on May 9, 2014, at 2:30 p.m., Roman L. Hruska Federal Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. The defendant is ordered to appear at this hearing.

3) For the reasons stated by counsel in the motion, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by continuing defendant's plea hearing outweigh the best interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the time between today's date and the acceptance or rejection of the anticipated plea of guilty shall be excluded for speedy trial calculation purposes. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer