U.S. v. LINEWEBER, 4:13CR3135. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20140619a87
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge. Defendant has moved to continue the trial currently set for July 7, 2014. (Filing No. 28). As explained in the motion, the parties are currently engaged in plea discussions. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 28), is granted. 2) The trial of this case is set to commence
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge. Defendant has moved to continue the trial currently set for July 7, 2014. (Filing No. 28). As explained in the motion, the parties are currently engaged in plea discussions. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 28), is granted. 2) The trial of this case is set to commence ..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant has moved to continue the trial currently set for July 7, 2014. (Filing No. 28). As explained in the motion, the parties are currently engaged in plea discussions. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 28), is granted.
2) The trial of this case is set to commence before the Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge, in Courtroom 1, United States Courthouse, Lincoln, Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on September 15, 2014, or as soon thereafter as the case may be called, for a duration of five (5) trial days. Jury selection will be held at commencement of trial.
3) Based upon the showing set forth in the defendant's motion and the representations of counsel, the Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by continuing the trial; and that the purposes served by continuing the trial date in this case outweigh the interest of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, the time between today's date and September 15, 2014, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because this case remains "unusual and complex," and continues to be exempted from the time restrictions of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii)i.
Source: Leagle
