METROPOLITAN OMAHA PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF OMAHA, 8:13CV230. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20140702b36
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. On May 16, 2014, John J. Malone, Sr. ("Malone") filed a motion to intervene ( filing 23 ) in this case. The Court denied Malone's motion on June 18, 2014, finding that Malone had not articulated reasons why intervention was necessary at that time. ( Filing 28. ) In so holding, the Court noted that the case had been stayed in light of ongoing settlement negotiations between the existing parties, and that Malone could reassert his motion to intervene upon co
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. On May 16, 2014, John J. Malone, Sr. ("Malone") filed a motion to intervene ( filing 23 ) in this case. The Court denied Malone's motion on June 18, 2014, finding that Malone had not articulated reasons why intervention was necessary at that time. ( Filing 28. ) In so holding, the Court noted that the case had been stayed in light of ongoing settlement negotiations between the existing parties, and that Malone could reassert his motion to intervene upon con..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge.
On May 16, 2014, John J. Malone, Sr. ("Malone") filed a motion to intervene (filing 23) in this case. The Court denied Malone's motion on June 18, 2014, finding that Malone had not articulated reasons why intervention was necessary at that time. (Filing 28.) In so holding, the Court noted that the case had been stayed in light of ongoing settlement negotiations between the existing parties, and that Malone could reassert his motion to intervene upon conclusion of the stay.
Malone has requested that the Court reconsider its order denying his motion to intervene. (Filing 29.) Malone maintains that the Court neglected to consider his reply brief and supporting affidavit in reaching its decision. Malone's motion to reconsider will be denied as the Court did carefully consider all the materials he submitted in reaching its decision on the motion to intervene.
IT IS ORDERED that John Malone's Motion to Reconsider (filing 29) is denied.
Source: Leagle
