U.S. v. DE LAO-OLVERA, 8:13CR286. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20140707i63
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, District Judge. This matter comes on before the Court upon the United States' Motion to Vacate Preliminary Order of Forfeiture and Dismiss Forfeiture Allegation (Filing No. 96). The Court reviews the record in this case and, being duly advised in the premises, finds the United States' Motion should be sustained. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows: 1. The United States' Motion is hereby sustained. 2. The Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (Filing No. 86) is vacated an
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, District Judge. This matter comes on before the Court upon the United States' Motion to Vacate Preliminary Order of Forfeiture and Dismiss Forfeiture Allegation (Filing No. 96). The Court reviews the record in this case and, being duly advised in the premises, finds the United States' Motion should be sustained. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows: 1. The United States' Motion is hereby sustained. 2. The Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (Filing No. 86) is vacated and..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, District Judge.
This matter comes on before the Court upon the United States' Motion to Vacate Preliminary Order of Forfeiture and Dismiss Forfeiture Allegation (Filing No. 96). The Court reviews the record in this case and, being duly advised in the premises, finds the United States' Motion should be sustained.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:
1. The United States' Motion is hereby sustained.
2. The Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (Filing No. 86) is vacated and the Forfeiture Allegation of the Superseding Indictment (Filing No. 44) is hereby dismissed.
Source: Leagle
