AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY v. GREATER OMAHA PACKING COMPANY, INC., 8:11CV270. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20140818e53
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on cross motions in limine (Filing No. 442 and Filing No. 450 ) regarding video-tape deposition designations. The Court has reviewed the Rebecca Hayne deposition testimony. In general, the testimony is an affirmation that a certain document states what it states. ( See Generally, Filing No. 406-1 ). The deponent has no independent recollection of the documents involved in the testimony, and she is only able to
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on cross motions in limine (Filing No. 442 and Filing No. 450 ) regarding video-tape deposition designations. The Court has reviewed the Rebecca Hayne deposition testimony. In general, the testimony is an affirmation that a certain document states what it states. ( See Generally, Filing No. 406-1 ). The deponent has no independent recollection of the documents involved in the testimony, and she is only able to i..
More
ORDER
LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross motions in limine (Filing No. 442 and Filing No. 450) regarding video-tape deposition designations.
The Court has reviewed the Rebecca Hayne deposition testimony. In general, the testimony is an affirmation that a certain document states what it states. (See Generally, Filing No. 406-1). The deponent has no independent recollection of the documents involved in the testimony, and she is only able to identify the documents or persons referenced in the documents. (Id.). Under the circumstances, the Court finds that the plaintiff's objections to Rebecca Hayne's deposition should be sustained. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's objections to Rebecca Hayne's deposition are sustained.
Source: Leagle
