Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY v. GREATER OMAHA PACKING COMPANY, INC., 8:11CV270. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20140819959 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on cross motions in limine (Filing No. 442 and Filing No. 450 ) regarding video-tape deposition designations. The Court has reviewed lines 158:3 to 248:14 of the William Buckner deposition testimony. The plaintiff argues that various portions of the deposition are irrelevant because the testimony relates exclusively to the dismissed counterclaim. ( See Filing No. 464 at 3-4). Regarding lines 158:3 to 248:14, i
More

ORDER

LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on cross motions in limine (Filing No. 442 and Filing No. 450) regarding video-tape deposition designations.

The Court has reviewed lines 158:3 to 248:14 of the William Buckner deposition testimony. The plaintiff argues that various portions of the deposition are irrelevant because the testimony relates exclusively to the dismissed counterclaim. (See Filing No. 464 at 3-4). Regarding lines 158:3 to 248:14, it appears the testimony concerns only the defendant's dismissed counter claim. If the defendant offering the testimony in lines 158:3 to 248:14, believes that it has other relevance,

IT IS ORDERED that defendant shall advise the Court by Friday, August 22, 2014, as to the defendant's claim to relevancy. Otherwise, the portion of the deposition will be stricken in its entirety.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer