U.S. v. GURROLA, 8:14CR256. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20140904b95
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINE [24]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 14-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by September 16, 2014. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINE [24] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before September 16, 2014. 2. The ends of justice
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINE [24]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 14-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by September 16, 2014. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINE [24] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before September 16, 2014. 2. The ends of justice h..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINE [24]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 14-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by September 16, 2014.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINE [24] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before September 16, 2014.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between September 2, 2014 and September 16, 2014, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
