U.S. v. TORRES, 8:13-CR-43. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20141027857
Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2014
Summary: ORDER JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the defendant's Motion to Dismiss (filing 470), the United States Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation that the motion be denied (filing 478), and the defendant's objection to the findings and recommendation (filing 483). The defendant's objection reasserts the same arguments she made to the Magistrate Judge. Filing 483 at 1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of the
Summary: ORDER JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the defendant's Motion to Dismiss (filing 470), the United States Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation that the motion be denied (filing 478), and the defendant's objection to the findings and recommendation (filing 483). The defendant's objection reasserts the same arguments she made to the Magistrate Judge. Filing 483 at 1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of the r..
More
ORDER
JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendant's Motion to Dismiss (filing 470), the United States Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation that the motion be denied (filing 478), and the defendant's objection to the findings and recommendation (filing 483). The defendant's objection reasserts the same arguments she made to the Magistrate Judge. Filing 483 at 1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record and is persuaded by the Magistrate Judge's reasoning. Accordingly, the Court will adopt the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, overrule the objection, and deny the motion to dismiss.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation (filing 478) are adopted.
2. The defendant's objection to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation (filing 483) is overruled.
3. The defendant's Motion to Dismiss (filing 470) is denied.
Source: Leagle
