TELFORD v. U.S., 7:13CV5001. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20141028h60
Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's verified opposition to the USA's motion to dismiss and plaintiff's motion for permission to file a second amended complaint (Filing No. 37 ). Plaintiff's response was not filed until October 16, 2014, after the September 30, 2014, deadline which she had requested. Having received no response, the Court dismissed this action on October 8, 2014. Therefore, plaintiff's motion for permission to file a seco
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's verified opposition to the USA's motion to dismiss and plaintiff's motion for permission to file a second amended complaint (Filing No. 37 ). Plaintiff's response was not filed until October 16, 2014, after the September 30, 2014, deadline which she had requested. Having received no response, the Court dismissed this action on October 8, 2014. Therefore, plaintiff's motion for permission to file a secon..
More
ORDER
LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's verified opposition to the USA's motion to dismiss and plaintiff's motion for permission to file a second amended complaint (Filing No. 37). Plaintiff's response was not filed until October 16, 2014, after the September 30, 2014, deadline which she had requested.
Having received no response, the Court dismissed this action on October 8, 2014. Therefore, plaintiff's motion for permission to file a second amended complaint is untimely and will be denied.
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's opposition to the USA's motion to dismiss is deemed untimely. Her motion to file an amended complaint is denied.
Source: Leagle
