PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, 8:12CV122. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20141028h65
Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the objections (Filing No. 467 ) of plaintiff Prism regarding certain trial issues. The issues regard whether AT&T may present the Frankel Reference at trial, whether Mr. Taylor may testify regarding the Fox Reference, whether AT&T may call Mr. Neal, and whether Mr. Greendyk may testify regarding a technical document. As to Mr. Greendyk, the Court wishes to have a better understanding of how Mr. Gre
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the objections (Filing No. 467 ) of plaintiff Prism regarding certain trial issues. The issues regard whether AT&T may present the Frankel Reference at trial, whether Mr. Taylor may testify regarding the Fox Reference, whether AT&T may call Mr. Neal, and whether Mr. Greendyk may testify regarding a technical document. As to Mr. Greendyk, the Court wishes to have a better understanding of how Mr. Gree..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the objections (Filing No. 467) of plaintiff Prism regarding certain trial issues. The issues regard whether AT&T may present the Frankel Reference at trial, whether Mr. Taylor may testify regarding the Fox Reference, whether AT&T may call Mr. Neal, and whether Mr. Greendyk may testify regarding a technical document.
As to Mr. Greendyk, the Court wishes to have a better understanding of how Mr. Greendyk intends to testify and whether his testimony will have the requisite foundation. The Court finds as follows.
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Plaintiff's objection regarding the Frankel Reference is sustained, and it is excluded.
2) Plaintiff's objection regarding Mr. Taylor is sustained, and he may not offer testimony on the Fox reference.
3) Plaintiff's objection regarding Mr. Neal is overruled. The Court's order (Filing No. 421) stands.
4) The Court defers the question of Mr. Greendyk until the time of his testimony.
Source: Leagle
