U.S. v. CABALLERO-ARREDONDO, 4:14CR3011-2. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20141028i00
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge. Based on the representations of government's counsel, additional time is needed to allow the government and the defendant sufficient time to negotiate a settlement of this matter, and allow the government to efficiently allocate it's resources for trial. The defendant agreed, and further agreed that the time between today and an additional status conference should be excluded from the time limitations of the Speedy Trial Act so that the c
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge. Based on the representations of government's counsel, additional time is needed to allow the government and the defendant sufficient time to negotiate a settlement of this matter, and allow the government to efficiently allocate it's resources for trial. The defendant agreed, and further agreed that the time between today and an additional status conference should be excluded from the time limitations of the Speedy Trial Act so that the ca..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
Based on the representations of government's counsel, additional time is needed to allow the government and the defendant sufficient time to negotiate a settlement of this matter, and allow the government to efficiently allocate it's resources for trial. The defendant agreed, and further agreed that the time between today and an additional status conference should be excluded from the time limitations of the Speedy Trial Act so that the case can be fairly and justly resolved.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Government's unopposed motion to continue trial (filing 82) is granted.
2) A status conference is set at 9:30 a.m. on November 17, 2014 before the undersigned magistrate judge in Courtroom 2, United States Courthouse and Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, Nebraska to discuss case progression and a potential trial setting.
3) The Court further finds that the time between today's date and November 17, 2014 shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because despite counsel's due diligence, additional time is needed to adequately prepare this case for trial and failing to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1) & (h)(7).
Source: Leagle
