PHIL-INSUL CORP. v. AIRLITE PLASTICS, CO., 8:12cv151. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20141215915
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2014
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge. This case came before the court for a status conference. Counsel appeared telephonically: John Passarelli and Paul Adams represented the plaintiff. Jon Nelson, Louis DiSanto, Matthew Heffron, and William Brown represented the defendants. The plaintiff, Phil-Insul Corp., informed the court that it will not file a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court (case 8:12cv91). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The current stay of thi
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge. This case came before the court for a status conference. Counsel appeared telephonically: John Passarelli and Paul Adams represented the plaintiff. Jon Nelson, Louis DiSanto, Matthew Heffron, and William Brown represented the defendants. The plaintiff, Phil-Insul Corp., informed the court that it will not file a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court (case 8:12cv91). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The current stay of this..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge.
This case came before the court for a status conference. Counsel appeared telephonically: John Passarelli and Paul Adams represented the plaintiff. Jon Nelson, Louis DiSanto, Matthew Heffron, and William Brown represented the defendants. The plaintiff, Phil-Insul Corp., informed the court that it will not file a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court (case 8:12cv91). Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The current stay of this case is hereby lifted.
2. The parties are given until January 9, 2015, to file an updated Rule 26(f) planning report.
Source: Leagle
