U.S. v. SAENZ-VALDEZ, 8:14CR391. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20141222a51
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2014
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Jessie Saenz-Valdez (Saenz-Valdez) for an extension of the pretrial motion deadline (Filing No. 30). The motion does not comply with NECrimR 12.1 (a) and paragraph 9 of the Progression Order (Filing No. 22) in that the motion is not accompanied by the defendant's affidavit or declaration stating that defendant: (1) Has been advised by counsel of the reasons for seeking a continuance; (2) Und
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Jessie Saenz-Valdez (Saenz-Valdez) for an extension of the pretrial motion deadline (Filing No. 30). The motion does not comply with NECrimR 12.1 (a) and paragraph 9 of the Progression Order (Filing No. 22) in that the motion is not accompanied by the defendant's affidavit or declaration stating that defendant: (1) Has been advised by counsel of the reasons for seeking a continuance; (2) Unde..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Jessie Saenz-Valdez (Saenz-Valdez) for an extension of the pretrial motion deadline (Filing No. 30). The motion does not comply with NECrimR 12.1 (a) and paragraph 9 of the Progression Order (Filing No. 22) in that the motion is not accompanied by the defendant's affidavit or declaration stating that defendant:
(1) Has been advised by counsel of the reasons for seeking a continuance;
(2) Understands that the time sought by the extension may be excluded from any calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq.; and
(3) With this understanding and knowledge, agrees to the filing of the motion.
Accordingly, the motion (Filing No. 30) is:
(X) Held in abeyance pending compliance with NECrimR 12.1(a) and Paragraph 9 of the Progression Order. Absent compliance on or before December 26, 2014, the motion will be deemed withdrawn and termed on the docket.
( ) Denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
