U.S. v. MORENO-AYALA, 8:14CR134 (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20141231a84
Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [23] as counsel must review discovery and needs additional time to prepare for trial. The defendant has previously complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial [23] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury tria now set for January 6, 2015 is continued to March 24, 2015. 2. Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial a
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [23] as counsel must review discovery and needs additional time to prepare for trial. The defendant has previously complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial [23] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury tria now set for January 6, 2015 is continued to March 24, 2015. 2. Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial as..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [23] as counsel must review discovery and needs additional time to prepare for trial. The defendant has previously complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial [23] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury tria now set for January 6, 2015 is continued to March 24, 2015.
2. Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial as soon as practical.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and March 24, 2015, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
