U.S. v. MOHAMAD, 8:14CR105. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20150123d00
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the Joint Motion to Continue Trial [36]. Due to counsels' schedules, additional time is needed to explore plea negotiations. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the joint motion to continue trial [36] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for January 27, 2015 is continued to April 7, 2015. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the cour
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the Joint Motion to Continue Trial [36]. Due to counsels' schedules, additional time is needed to explore plea negotiations. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the joint motion to continue trial [36] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for January 27, 2015 is continued to April 7, 2015. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Joint Motion to Continue Trial [36]. Due to counsels' schedules, additional time is needed to explore plea negotiations. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the joint motion to continue trial [36] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial now set for January 27, 2015 is continued to April 7, 2015.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and April 7, 2015, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
