U.S. v. LONG, 4:07CR98. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20150403883
Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LAURIE SMITH CAMP , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Withdraw (Filing No. 146) filed by David Stickman, defense counsel for Defendant Roland D. Long. In the motion, defense counsel represents that Mr. Long intends to proceed pro se with regard to his motion to reduce sentence. Also before the Court is the Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence — USSC Amendment (Filing No. 138). The Court has received and reviewed the 2014 Drug Retro
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LAURIE SMITH CAMP , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Withdraw (Filing No. 146) filed by David Stickman, defense counsel for Defendant Roland D. Long. In the motion, defense counsel represents that Mr. Long intends to proceed pro se with regard to his motion to reduce sentence. Also before the Court is the Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence — USSC Amendment (Filing No. 138). The Court has received and reviewed the 2014 Drug Retroa..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAURIE SMITH CAMP, Chief District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Withdraw (Filing No. 146) filed by David Stickman, defense counsel for Defendant Roland D. Long. In the motion, defense counsel represents that Mr. Long intends to proceed pro se with regard to his motion to reduce sentence. Also before the Court is the Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence — USSC Amendment (Filing No. 138). The Court has received and reviewed the 2014 Drug Retroactive Sentencing Worksheet ("Worksheet") prepared and submitted by the District of Nebraska's Probation Office1. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Motion to Withdraw (Filing No. 146) filed by David Stickman is granted;
2. No later than May 4, 2015, the parties shall file any objections, stipulations, or other statements regarding the Worksheet;
3. In the event that the parties do not respond by the deadline listed above, the Court will rule, without further notice, on the Dependant's eligibility for a reduction in his sentence pursuant to the information contained in the Worksheet; and
4. The Clerk of Court is ordered to mail a copy of this order and copies of Filing Nos. 144 and 145 to the Defendant as his last known address.
FootNotes
1. According to the ECF Docket Sheet in this case, the Worksheet was sent to parties on December 16, 2014.
Source: Leagle
