U.S. v. STRATBUCKER, 8:14CB11. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20150417d06
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the joint motion to continue trial (Filing No. 27). The parties seek a thirty-day continuance of the trial of this matter which is scheduled for April 28, 2015. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The joint motion to continue trial (Filing No. 27) is granted. 2. Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on May 26, 2015, before the undersigned magistrate judge. The end
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the joint motion to continue trial (Filing No. 27). The parties seek a thirty-day continuance of the trial of this matter which is scheduled for April 28, 2015. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The joint motion to continue trial (Filing No. 27) is granted. 2. Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on May 26, 2015, before the undersigned magistrate judge. The ends..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the joint motion to continue trial (Filing No. 27). The parties seek a thirty-day continuance of the trial of this matter which is scheduled for April 28, 2015. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The joint motion to continue trial (Filing No. 27) is granted.
2. Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on May 26, 2015, before the undersigned magistrate judge. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between April 16, 2015, and May 26, 2015, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
