U.S. v. SLAVICEK, 8:15CR31. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20150521c35
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 20, 2015
Latest Update: May 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [18] as both counsel will be out of the district or out of the country. The parties are exploring plea negotiations. Good cause being shown, the motion will be granted and the trial shall be continued. The defendant shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial [18] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for Jun
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [18] as both counsel will be out of the district or out of the country. The parties are exploring plea negotiations. Good cause being shown, the motion will be granted and the trial shall be continued. The defendant shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial [18] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for June..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [18] as both counsel will be out of the district or out of the country. The parties are exploring plea negotiations. Good cause being shown, the motion will be granted and the trial shall be continued. The defendant shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a).
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial [18] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial now set for June 2, 2015 is continued to July 14, 2015.
2. Defendant is ordered to file a waiver of speedy trial as soon as practicable
3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and July 14, 2015, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
