U.S. v. ORAMAS, 4:15CR3027. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20150605b82
Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Angel Oramas has moved to continue the trial currently set for June 29, 2015. (Filing No. 73). As explained in the motion, defense counsel is not available during the current trial setting. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant Angel Oramas' motion to continue, (filing no. 73), is granted. 2) As to all de
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Angel Oramas has moved to continue the trial currently set for June 29, 2015. (Filing No. 73). As explained in the motion, defense counsel is not available during the current trial setting. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant Angel Oramas' motion to continue, (filing no. 73), is granted. 2) As to all def..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Angel Oramas has moved to continue the trial currently set for June 29, 2015. (Filing No. 73). As explained in the motion, defense counsel is not available during the current trial setting. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant Angel Oramas' motion to continue, (filing no. 73), is granted.
2) As to all defendants, the trial of this case is set to commence before the Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge, in Courtroom 1, United States Courthouse, Lincoln, Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on August 17, 2015, or as soon thereafter as the case may be called, for a duration of five (5) trial days. Jury selection will be held at commencement of trial.
3) Based upon the showing set forth in the defendant Angel Oramas' motion and the representations of counsel, the Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by continuing the trial; and that the purposes served by continuing the trial date in this case outweigh the interest of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, as to all defendants, the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, the time between today's date and August 17, 2015, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because despite counsel's due diligence, additional time is needed to adequately prepare this case for trial and failing to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1), (h)(6) & (h)(7).
Source: Leagle
