JOAO BOCK TRANSACTION SYSTEMS, LLC v. ONLINE RESOURCES CORP., 8:13CV245. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20150901b01
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2015
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Joao Bock Transaction Systems, LLC's request for redaction (Filing No. 197). On July 16, 2015, the court allowed the transcript of the June 5, 2015, Markman Hearing (Filing No. 196) to be sealed pending resolution of the parties' request for redaction. See Filing No. 194. The request was prompted by nonparty Richard V. Wells' request for the transcript, which the court delayed pending resolution of the red
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Joao Bock Transaction Systems, LLC's request for redaction (Filing No. 197). On July 16, 2015, the court allowed the transcript of the June 5, 2015, Markman Hearing (Filing No. 196) to be sealed pending resolution of the parties' request for redaction. See Filing No. 194. The request was prompted by nonparty Richard V. Wells' request for the transcript, which the court delayed pending resolution of the reda..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Joao Bock Transaction Systems, LLC's request for redaction (Filing No. 197). On July 16, 2015, the court allowed the transcript of the June 5, 2015, Markman Hearing (Filing No. 196) to be sealed pending resolution of the parties' request for redaction. See Filing No. 194. The request was prompted by nonparty Richard V. Wells' request for the transcript, which the court delayed pending resolution of the redaction request. See Filing No. 192 — Order. The plaintiff proposes limited redactions to protect confidential information contained on page 76 of the transcript. See Filing No. 197. The court finds good cause exists to allow the redactions prior to the transcript's public disclosure. Upon consideration,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The plaintiff's unopposed request for redaction (Filing No. 197) is granted.
2. The Court Reporter is directed to redact the transcript of the June 5, 2015, Markman Hearing to redact portions of lines 5, 7, and 11 of page 76, as requested.
3. The Court Reporter may deliver the redacted transcript to any requesting third-party in the normal course of business.
Source: Leagle
