U.S. v. VENTURA, 8:15CR259. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20150922978
Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS [20]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by October 21, 2015. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS [20] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before October 21, 2015. 2. The ends of justice have been served by granting suc
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS [20]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by October 21, 2015. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS [20] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before October 21, 2015. 2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS [20]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by October 21, 2015.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS [20] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before October 21, 2015.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between September 21, 2015 and October 21, 2015, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
