Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. HACKER, 4:15CR3124. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20151211a10 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has moved to continue her arraignment, (filing no. 8), because the defense counsel is not able to attend on the currently scheduled date. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 8), is granted. 2) Defendant's arraignment will be held in Courtroom 2, United States Courthouse,
More

ORDER

Defendant has moved to continue her arraignment, (filing no. 8), because the defense counsel is not able to attend on the currently scheduled date. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 8), is granted. 2) Defendant's arraignment will be held in Courtroom 2, United States Courthouse, Lincoln, Nebraska, on January 6, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. 3) Based upon the representations of counsel, the Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by delaying the arraignment, and the time between today's date and January 6, 2016 shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer