ACI WORLDWIDE CORP. v. MasterCARD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 8:14CV31. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20160122946
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT , Magistrate Judge . Baldwin, Hackett & Meeks, Inc. ("BHMI"), a non-party to this action, has filed a motion requesting that the undersigned stay the order ( filing 290 ) entered on January 19, 2016. That order modified the protective order in this case to allow Plaintiff to request in camera review by the state court judge of certain documents produced in this case. The order did not grant Plaintiff the absolute right to introduce the documents into evidence in the sta
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT , Magistrate Judge . Baldwin, Hackett & Meeks, Inc. ("BHMI"), a non-party to this action, has filed a motion requesting that the undersigned stay the order ( filing 290 ) entered on January 19, 2016. That order modified the protective order in this case to allow Plaintiff to request in camera review by the state court judge of certain documents produced in this case. The order did not grant Plaintiff the absolute right to introduce the documents into evidence in the stat..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge.
Baldwin, Hackett & Meeks, Inc. ("BHMI"), a non-party to this action, has filed a motion requesting that the undersigned stay the order (filing 290) entered on January 19, 2016. That order modified the protective order in this case to allow Plaintiff to request in camera review by the state court judge of certain documents produced in this case. The order did not grant Plaintiff the absolute right to introduce the documents into evidence in the state court case, nor did it infringe upon orders entered by the state court judge. All the order did was allow for in camera review of the documents by the state court judge at that judge's discretion.
The undersigned has no intention of modifying this ruling. However, the ruling may be one subject to review. Therefore, the undersigned will grant the stay in order to allow BHMI an opportunity to object. However, BHMI is advised that any objection should be filed promptly.
IT IS ORDERED that BHMI's Motion to Stay (filing 295) is granted.
Source: Leagle
