Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

RIBEIRO v. BABY TREND, INC., 8:12CV204. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20160201d49 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on defendants' Lerado (Zhong Shan) Industrial Co., Ltd., Lerado China Limited, Lerado Group (Holding) Company, Ltd., Lerado Group Co., Ltd., Lerado H.K. Limited motion to dismiss the Sixth Amended Complaint, Filing No. 201; defendant Gnotec Reftele AB's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, Filing No. 213; and plaintiffs' motion for a hearing regarding the motions to dismiss
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on defendants' Lerado (Zhong Shan) Industrial Co., Ltd., Lerado China Limited, Lerado Group (Holding) Company, Ltd., Lerado Group Co., Ltd., Lerado H.K. Limited motion to dismiss the Sixth Amended Complaint, Filing No. 201; defendant Gnotec Reftele AB's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, Filing No. 213; and plaintiffs' motion for a hearing regarding the motions to dismiss, Filing No. 312. Subsequent to the filings of these motions, plaintiff filed a Seventh Amended Complaint. Filing No. 328. As a result, all motions are moot at this time. Defendants are free to file appropriate motions or answers as they deem fit with regard to the Seventh Amended Complaint.

THEREORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' motion to dismiss, Filing No. 201, is denied as moot;

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss, Filing No. 213, is denied as moot; and

3. Plaintiffs' motion for a hearing, Filing No. 312, is denied as moot.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer