AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. WARNER, 4:15CV3086. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20160219a73
Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has now filed a return of service as to Defendants Warner and Dynamic Construction & Roofing, LLC. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's motion to keep this case open pending service on Defendants Warner and Dynamic Construction & Roofing, LLC., (Filing No. 20), is denied as moot. 2) Plaintiff has shown sufficient cause to excuse its delay in serving all defendants. As such, the case is not subject to dismissal at this time pursu
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has now filed a return of service as to Defendants Warner and Dynamic Construction & Roofing, LLC. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's motion to keep this case open pending service on Defendants Warner and Dynamic Construction & Roofing, LLC., (Filing No. 20), is denied as moot. 2) Plaintiff has shown sufficient cause to excuse its delay in serving all defendants. As such, the case is not subject to dismissal at this time pursua..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has now filed a return of service as to Defendants Warner and Dynamic Construction & Roofing, LLC.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Plaintiff's motion to keep this case open pending service on Defendants Warner and Dynamic Construction & Roofing, LLC., (Filing No. 20), is denied as moot.
2) Plaintiff has shown sufficient cause to excuse its delay in serving all defendants. As such, the case is not subject to dismissal at this time pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution.
Source: Leagle
