U.S. v. BARRICKMAN, 8:15CR164. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20160222976
Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [71] as counsel needs additional time to review discovery.The defendant has previously complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). See filing [67]. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial currently set for February 23, 2016 is continued to June 14, 2016. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [71] as counsel needs additional time to review discovery.The defendant has previously complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). See filing [67]. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial currently set for February 23, 2016 is continued to June 14, 2016. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the c..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [71] as counsel needs additional time to review discovery.The defendant has previously complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). See filing [67]. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial currently set for February 23, 2016 is continued to June 14, 2016.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and June 14, 2016 shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
