U.S. v. JONES, 8:15CR347. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20160225c20
Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Kiyoshi Desi Jones (Jones) (Filing No. 26). Jones seeks a continuance of the trial of this matter which was scheduled for February 29, 2016. Jones' counsel represents that Jones will file an affidavit whereby Jones consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Jones' counsel represent
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Kiyoshi Desi Jones (Jones) (Filing No. 26). Jones seeks a continuance of the trial of this matter which was scheduled for February 29, 2016. Jones' counsel represents that Jones will file an affidavit whereby Jones consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Jones' counsel represents..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Kiyoshi Desi Jones (Jones) (Filing No. 26). Jones seeks a continuance of the trial of this matter which was scheduled for February 29, 2016. Jones' counsel represents that Jones will file an affidavit whereby Jones consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Jones' counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Jones' motion to continue trial (Filing No. 26) is granted.
2. Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for March 28, 2016, before Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between February 24, 2016, and March 28, 2016, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
