Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Conn, 8:15CR160. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20160510c82 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 09, 2016
Latest Update: May 09, 2016
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Eric Conn (Conn) (Filing No. 30). Conn seeks a continuance of the trial of this matter which was scheduled for May 9, 2016. Conn's counsel represents Conn consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Conn's counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection to the motion.
More

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Eric Conn (Conn) (Filing No. 30). Conn seeks a continuance of the trial of this matter which was scheduled for May 9, 2016. Conn's counsel represents Conn consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Conn's counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted.

No further motions for a continuance will be granted absent a showing by affidavit that a material injustice would occur if a requested continuance were not granted.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Conn's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 30) is granted.

2. Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for June 13, 2016, before Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between May 9, 2016, and June 13, 2016, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer