U.S. v. Cervantes-Morales, 8:16CR71. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20160518c72
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 17, 2016
Latest Update: May 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [22] as counsel needs additional time to review discovery and explore plea negotiations. The defendant shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, currently set for May 25, 2016 is continued to June 28, 2016. 2. Defendant is ordered to file a waiver of speedy tri
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [22] as counsel needs additional time to review discovery and explore plea negotiations. The defendant shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, currently set for May 25, 2016 is continued to June 28, 2016. 2. Defendant is ordered to file a waiver of speedy tria..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [22] as counsel needs additional time to review discovery and explore plea negotiations. The defendant shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, currently set for May 25, 2016 is continued to June 28, 2016.
2. Defendant is ordered to file a waiver of speedy trial as soon as practicable.
3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and June 28, 2016 shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
