U.S. v. AGUIRRE, 8:16CR63. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20160628e74
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the motion to continue the trial of this matter by Gilbert Gomez, Sr. (Filing No. 79). Gomez `s counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted and trial will be continued as to all remaining defendants. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Gomez's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 79) is granted. 2. Trial of this matter as to all defendants is re-scheduled f
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the motion to continue the trial of this matter by Gilbert Gomez, Sr. (Filing No. 79). Gomez `s counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted and trial will be continued as to all remaining defendants. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Gomez's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 79) is granted. 2. Trial of this matter as to all defendants is re-scheduled fo..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion to continue the trial of this matter by Gilbert Gomez, Sr. (Filing No. 79). Gomez `s counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted and trial will be continued as to all remaining defendants.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Gomez's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 79) is granted.
2. Trial of this matter as to all defendants is re-scheduled for August 29, 2016, before Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between June 27, 2016, and August 29, 2016, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that defendants' counsel require additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
