MANNING v. COTTON, 8:15CV107. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20161108f33
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the court sua sponte. The Court notes that the defendants have filed an interlocutory appeal. Filing No. 60. The defendants contend that the Court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment regarding qualified and municipal immunity. Filing Nos. 60 and 53. Upon reviewing the case, the Court believes it is best and most efficient for all involved if this case is stayed pending said appeal. THEREFORE, IT IS O
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the court sua sponte. The Court notes that the defendants have filed an interlocutory appeal. Filing No. 60. The defendants contend that the Court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment regarding qualified and municipal immunity. Filing Nos. 60 and 53. Upon reviewing the case, the Court believes it is best and most efficient for all involved if this case is stayed pending said appeal. THEREFORE, IT IS OR..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court sua sponte. The Court notes that the defendants have filed an interlocutory appeal. Filing No. 60. The defendants contend that the Court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment regarding qualified and municipal immunity. Filing Nos. 60 and 53. Upon reviewing the case, the Court believes it is best and most efficient for all involved if this case is stayed pending said appeal.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. This case is stayed pending appeal.
2. The motion in limine, Filing No. 48, is denied at this time, but it is subject to reassertion pending the appeal.
Source: Leagle