Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. STANKO, 8:05CR93. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20170301d32 Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO WITHDRAW EXHIBITS OR TO SHOW CAUSE WHY EXHIBITS. SHOULD NOT BE DESTROYED JOSEPH F. BATAILLON , District Judge . Pursuant to NECivR 79.1(f) or NECrimR 55.1(g), the pro se party shall either 1) withdraw the following exhibits previously submitted in this matter within 14 calendar days of the date of this order, or 2) show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed: Defendant's exhibit numbers: 101-112 from hearing held December 28-29, 2005 1-12 from Motion Hearing held April 1
More

ORDER TO WITHDRAW EXHIBITS OR TO SHOW CAUSE WHY EXHIBITS. SHOULD NOT BE DESTROYED

Pursuant to NECivR 79.1(f) or NECrimR 55.1(g), the pro se party shall either 1) withdraw the following exhibits previously submitted in this matter within 14 calendar days of the date of this order, or 2) show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed:

Defendant's exhibit numbers: 101-112 from hearing held December 28-29, 2005 1-12 from Motion Hearing held April 10, 2006 26A, 27A, 105, 107 from Trial held April 17-21, 2006 101-104 from Supervised Release Hearing held August 21, 2013

If the pro se party fails to withdraw these exhibits as directed or to show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed, the clerk's office is directed to destroy the listed exhibits without further notice to the parties or order from the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer