U.S. v. NAVARRO-MARTINEZ, 8:17CR110. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20170531f19
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 30, 2017
Latest Update: May 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant Jose Manuel Zavala-Barron's Motion to Continue Trial [48]. Counsel needs addition time to prepare for trial and to explore plea negotiations and has indicated that defendant will comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [48] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for June 5, 2017 is continued to July 17, 2017.
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant Jose Manuel Zavala-Barron's Motion to Continue Trial [48]. Counsel needs addition time to prepare for trial and to explore plea negotiations and has indicated that defendant will comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [48] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for June 5, 2017 is continued to July 17, 2017. ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant Jose Manuel Zavala-Barron's Motion to Continue Trial [48]. Counsel needs addition time to prepare for trial and to explore plea negotiations and has indicated that defendant will comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [48] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for June 5, 2017 is continued to July 17, 2017.
2. The defendant shall file the affidavit required by paragraph 9 of the progression order and NE.CrimR 12.1(a) forthwith.
3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and July 17, 2017, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
