U.S. v. RAMOS, 8:17CR104. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20170818f11
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2017
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant Juan Diaz-Lopez's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [38]. Counsel requires additional time to review evidence and prepare for trial. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a) at filing [27]. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [38] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for August 21, 2017 is continued to October 16, 2017.
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant Juan Diaz-Lopez's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [38]. Counsel requires additional time to review evidence and prepare for trial. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a) at filing [27]. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [38] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for August 21, 2017 is continued to October 16, 2017. ..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant Juan Diaz-Lopez's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [38]. Counsel requires additional time to review evidence and prepare for trial. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a) at filing [27]. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [38] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for August 21, 2017 is continued to October 16, 2017.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and October 16, 2017, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
