U.S. v. RASGADO, 8:17CR125. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20170825i17
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2017
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [19]. Counsel is seeking additional time to negotiate a plea with the government short of trial. Defendant shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [19] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for August 29, 2017 is continued, to October 3, 2017. 2. The defendant shall file an affidavit required
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [19]. Counsel is seeking additional time to negotiate a plea with the government short of trial. Defendant shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [19] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for August 29, 2017 is continued, to October 3, 2017. 2. The defendant shall file an affidavit required ..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [19]. Counsel is seeking additional time to negotiate a plea with the government short of trial. Defendant shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a).
IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [19] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for August 29, 2017 is continued, to October 3, 2017.
2. The defendant shall file an affidavit required by paragraph 9 of the progression order and NE.CrimR 12.1(a) forthwith.
3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and October 3, 2017, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
