PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., 8:12CV123. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20171002g04
Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 (Filing No. 637 ). The Court has reviewed plaintiff's brief in support of said motion (Filing No. 638 ) and its index of evidence (Filing No. 639 ). Defendant filed its response in opposition to Prism's motion to alter or amend the judgment (Filing No. 640 ) and plaintiff submitted a reply brief in further support of its motion (F
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 (Filing No. 637 ). The Court has reviewed plaintiff's brief in support of said motion (Filing No. 638 ) and its index of evidence (Filing No. 639 ). Defendant filed its response in opposition to Prism's motion to alter or amend the judgment (Filing No. 640 ) and plaintiff submitted a reply brief in further support of its motion (Fi..
More
ORDER
LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 (Filing No. 637). The Court has reviewed plaintiff's brief in support of said motion (Filing No. 638) and its index of evidence (Filing No. 639). Defendant filed its response in opposition to Prism's motion to alter or amend the judgment (Filing No. 640) and plaintiff submitted a reply brief in further support of its motion (Filing No. 641).
Having reviewed the motion, together with all the briefs and the index filed in support of and in opposition to said motion, the Court finds said motion should be denied. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 is denied.
Source: Leagle
