USA v. Mayfield, 8:17CR224. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20171026f15
Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2017
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [57] with attached supporting affidavit. Counsel needs additional time to conclude plea negotiations. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [57] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for October 30, 2017 is continued to January 2, 2018. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A),
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [57] with attached supporting affidavit. Counsel needs additional time to conclude plea negotiations. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [57] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for October 30, 2017 is continued to January 2, 2018. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), t..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [57] with attached supporting affidavit. Counsel needs additional time to conclude plea negotiations. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a).
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [57] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for October 30, 2017 is continued to January 2, 2018.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and January 2, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
