USA v. Bailey, 8:17CR61. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20171122g63
Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [55]. Counsel will be in trial in Sarpy County District Court on another matter. Counsel requests trial in February and the government does not object. Defendant shall comply with NE.CrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [55] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for December 18, 2016 is continued to Februar
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [55]. Counsel will be in trial in Sarpy County District Court on another matter. Counsel requests trial in February and the government does not object. Defendant shall comply with NE.CrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [55] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for December 18, 2016 is continued to February..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [55]. Counsel will be in trial in Sarpy County District Court on another matter. Counsel requests trial in February and the government does not object. Defendant shall comply with NE.CrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [55] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial now set for December 18, 2016 is continued to February 5, 2018.
2. The defendant shall file the affidavit required by paragraph 9 of the progression order and NE.CrimR 12.1(a) forthwith.
3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and February 5, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
