USA v. Garza, 8:17CR103. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20171205b28
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2017
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . The defendant, Gabriella Valdez, has moved to continue the trial in the above case (filing no. 109). The motion to continue is unopposed by counsel for the Government. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant Gabriella Valdez's unopposed motion to continue trial in the above case (filing no. 109) is granted. 2) The trial of this case as to defendants Gabri
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . The defendant, Gabriella Valdez, has moved to continue the trial in the above case (filing no. 109). The motion to continue is unopposed by counsel for the Government. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant Gabriella Valdez's unopposed motion to continue trial in the above case (filing no. 109) is granted. 2) The trial of this case as to defendants Gabrie..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
The defendant, Gabriella Valdez, has moved to continue the trial in the above case (filing no. 109). The motion to continue is unopposed by counsel for the Government. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant Gabriella Valdez's unopposed motion to continue trial in the above case (filing no. 109) is granted.
2) The trial of this case as to defendants Gabriella Valdez and Rigoberto Cervantes is set to commence before the Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge, in the Special Proceedings Courtroom of the United States Courthouse, Omaha, Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on January 29, 2018, or as soon thereafter as the case may be called. Jury selection will be held at commencement of trial.
3) Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this court's local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Source: Leagle
