USA v. Wolfe, 8:17CR154. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20171207d12
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2017
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant Lawrence L. Merrick's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [115]. Counsel will be unavailable several times in the month of January. The defendant has completed a speedy trial affidavit at filing [59]. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [115] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for January 2, 2018, is continued to March 5, 2018.
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant Lawrence L. Merrick's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [115]. Counsel will be unavailable several times in the month of January. The defendant has completed a speedy trial affidavit at filing [59]. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [115] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for January 2, 2018, is continued to March 5, 2018. ..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant Lawrence L. Merrick's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [115]. Counsel will be unavailable several times in the month of January. The defendant has completed a speedy trial affidavit at filing [59]. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [115] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for January 2, 2018, is continued to March 5, 2018.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and March 5, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
