USA v. Johnson, 8:16CR241. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180102912
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2017
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant Sakris Labachyan's Unopposed Motion to Continue Jury Trial [104]. Counsel informs the court that he has a previously scheduled jury trial in the Douglas County Court as well as needing additional time to communicate with co-defendant's counsel. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Jury Trial [104] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for both defendants, now set for January 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant Sakris Labachyan's Unopposed Motion to Continue Jury Trial [104]. Counsel informs the court that he has a previously scheduled jury trial in the Douglas County Court as well as needing additional time to communicate with co-defendant's counsel. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Jury Trial [104] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for both defendants, now set for January 16, 2018,..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant Sakris Labachyan's Unopposed Motion to Continue Jury Trial [104]. Counsel informs the court that he has a previously scheduled jury trial in the Douglas County Court as well as needing additional time to communicate with co-defendant's counsel.
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Jury Trial [104] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, for both defendants, now set for January 16, 2018, is continued to March 5, 2018.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and March 5, 2018 shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
