USA v. Aispuro-Vidana, 8:17CR287. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180110b67
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [21]. Counsel is seeking additional time to make further attempts to find a mutually acceptable resolution to resolve this matter short of trial. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [21] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for January 9, 2018, is continued to February 13, 2018. 2. In accord
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [21]. Counsel is seeking additional time to make further attempts to find a mutually acceptable resolution to resolve this matter short of trial. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [21] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for January 9, 2018, is continued to February 13, 2018. 2. In accorda..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [21]. Counsel is seeking additional time to make further attempts to find a mutually acceptable resolution to resolve this matter short of trial. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [21] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for January 9, 2018, is continued to February 13, 2018.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and February 13, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
