USA v. Turner, 4:17CR3121. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180208c11
Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF , Senior District Judge . At the conclusion of a suppression hearing on January 16, 2018, Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart, on the record, made certain findings of fact (Filing No. 42) and recommended that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Filing No. 20) be denied. No objections to the Findings and Recommendation were filed within 14 days following the filing of the transcript of the hearing, as instructed by Judge Zwart and as specified by 28 U.S.C. 636
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF , Senior District Judge . At the conclusion of a suppression hearing on January 16, 2018, Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart, on the record, made certain findings of fact (Filing No. 42) and recommended that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Filing No. 20) be denied. No objections to the Findings and Recommendation were filed within 14 days following the filing of the transcript of the hearing, as instructed by Judge Zwart and as specified by 28 U.S.C. 636(..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RICHARD G. KOPF, Senior District Judge.
At the conclusion of a suppression hearing on January 16, 2018, Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart, on the record, made certain findings of fact (Filing No. 42) and recommended that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Filing No. 20) be denied. No objections to the Findings and Recommendation were filed within 14 days following the filing of the transcript of the hearing, as instructed by Judge Zwart and as specified by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
I have conducted a de novo review of the record. I find that inasmuch as the Magistrate Judge has fully, carefully, and correctly found the facts and applied the law, the Findings and Recommendation should be adopted and Defendant's motion to suppress should be denied. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation (Filing No. 42 at CM/ECF pp. 55-57) are adopted.
2. Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Filing No. 20) is denied.
Source: Leagle
