USA v. Castaneda, 8:17CR237. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180208c17
Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [37]. Counsel was recently retained and has not yet received discovery materials. Counsel is seeking additional time to examine discovery and prepare a defense. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [37] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for February 13, 2018, is continued to March 27, 2018.
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [37]. Counsel was recently retained and has not yet received discovery materials. Counsel is seeking additional time to examine discovery and prepare a defense. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [37] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for February 13, 2018, is continued to March 27, 2018. ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [37]. Counsel was recently retained and has not yet received discovery materials. Counsel is seeking additional time to examine discovery and prepare a defense. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [37] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for February 13, 2018, is continued to March 27, 2018.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and March 27, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
