Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Mazzulla, 4:17-CR-3089. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20180216b20 Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOHN M. GERRARD , District Judge . The defendant, Rodney P. Mazzulla, has objected (filing 102) to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations (filing 76) and (filing 91) denying the defendant's motions to suppress (filing 39) and (filing 54). The Court has conducted a de novo review of the motions to suppress, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). The Court concurs in the Magistrate Judge's factual findings and legal analysis, and finds the defendant's objections to be without m
More

ORDER

The defendant, Rodney P. Mazzulla, has objected (filing 102) to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations (filing 76) and (filing 91) denying the defendant's motions to suppress (filing 39) and (filing 54). The Court has conducted a de novo review of the motions to suppress, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court concurs in the Magistrate Judge's factual findings and legal analysis, and finds the defendant's objections to be without merit. The Court will therefore adopt the Findings and Recommendations.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations (filing 76) and (filing 91) are adopted. 2. The defendant's objection (filing 102) is overruled. 3. The defendant's Motions to Suppress (filing 39) and (filing 54) are denied.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer