U.S. v. Valdez, 4:17CR3130. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180227b04
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , District Judge . Defendant has moved to continue the trial currently set for March 5, 2018. (Filing No. 22). As explained in the motion, Defendant needs additional time to review discovery, investigate this case and prepare for trial. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 22), is granted. 2) The trial
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , District Judge . Defendant has moved to continue the trial currently set for March 5, 2018. (Filing No. 22). As explained in the motion, Defendant needs additional time to review discovery, investigate this case and prepare for trial. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 22), is granted. 2) The trial ..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, District Judge.
Defendant has moved to continue the trial currently set for March 5, 2018. (Filing No. 22). As explained in the motion, Defendant needs additional time to review discovery, investigate this case and prepare for trial. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 22), is granted.
2) The trial of this case is set to commence before the Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge, in Courtroom 1, United States Courthouse, Lincoln, Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on April 30, 2018, or as soon thereafter as the case may be called, for a duration of three (3) trial days. Jury selection will be held at commencement of trial.
3) Based upon the showing set forth in Defendant's motion and the representations of counsel, the Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by continuing the trial; and that the purposes served by continuing the trial date in this case outweigh the interest of Defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, the time between today's date and April 30, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because although counsel have been duly diligent, additional time is needed to adequately prepare this case for trial and failing to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1) & (h)(7). Failing to object to this order as provided under the court's local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Source: Leagle
