U.S. v. Garcia, 8:16CR308. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180302d01
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant Guzman's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [71]. Counsel is seeking additional time to resolve the issues the defendant's therapist raised in the last report. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant Guzman's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [71] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for March 6, 2018, is continued to May 1, 2018. 2. In accord
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant Guzman's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [71]. Counsel is seeking additional time to resolve the issues the defendant's therapist raised in the last report. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant Guzman's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [71] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for March 6, 2018, is continued to May 1, 2018. 2. In accorda..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant Guzman's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [71]. Counsel is seeking additional time to resolve the issues the defendant's therapist raised in the last report. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant Guzman's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [71] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for March 6, 2018, is continued to May 1, 2018.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and May 1, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
